Sunday, March 15, 2015

Your favorite comic characters look very different







Story highlights


  • Superman, Wonder Woman and Archie all debuted new looks Thursday

  • Three of the most well-known comic book characters of all time look radically different




Three major characters — Superman, Wonder Woman (both of DC Comics, a Time Warner company, like CNN) and Archie Andrews — came out with new looks (and costumes in two cases) Thursday.


Superman and Wonder Woman are no stranger to change over time, but these are pretty different from what we’re used to.


Superman and Wonder Woman got makeovers this week.

Superman and Wonder Woman got makeovers this week.



Wonder Woman is back to wearing pants (similar to her style circa 2010, not to mention a brief time in the 1970s) along with something of a turtleneck and body armor.


Superman looks the most casual that we’ve ever seen him, simply in a t-shirt and jeans, and decidedly shorter hair. He also looks like someone you might not want to come across in a dark alley.


As for Archie (who never really died, by the way), he’s getting ready for his promised TV show by debuting a modern look — one that makes it much easier to see why Betty and Veronica have been fighting for his affections all of these years.


It’s been a whirlwind time for comic book fans, and there will be a lot to get used to.




Microsoft Store

Source link



Your favorite comic characters look very different

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Gun rights group fights armor-piercing bullet ban




The Second Amendment Foundation, which typically focuses on legal efforts to protect gun rights, is taking aim at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ proposal to ban popular “green tip” steel core bullets with a $700,000 nationwide radio and TV ad campaign. The group’s one-minute ad will air on conservative outlets like Fox News and The Blaze urging Americans to petition President Barack Obama to kill the proposal just one week before the comment period ends.


Gun rights groups are painting the ATF’s suggested ban as another executive overstep by Obama, this time aimed at stripping gun owners of ammunition typically used in the AR-15 assault rifle.


The new ban was proposed by the ATF and there’s no evidence it was initiated by the White House or the president in the same way Obama used his executive power to shield millions of undocumented immigrants from deportation.



The ammunition was exempted from the 1986 Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act, which banned armor-piercing bullets that could be used in handguns but not those used in rifles, which were seen as intended for sporting purposes. New handguns, though, can accommodate those same armor-piercing bullets exempted in the 1986 law and the ATF is concerned the bullets now put police officers at risk.


But the Second Amendment Foundation charged that the ATF is tackling a nonexistent problem.


“This appears to be a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist,” said David Workman, the group’s communications director. “I can’t find — nor can anybody else find — any evidence that any of these bullets has ever been fired from a handgun that’s harmed a police officer.”


Instead, gun rights groups are taking the ammo ban as a “backdoor attempt” to clamp down on assault rifles, after gun control advocates failed to ban assault rifles.


Other types of ammunition that can’t pierce body armor would still be available for the AR-15 assault rifle under the new regulation.


“It’s not the need for the ammunition,” Workman said. “Why does anybody need to ban it? That’s the real question.”




Microsoft Store

Source link



Gun rights group fights armor-piercing bullet ban

Sunday, March 8, 2015

Disarray at NBC News: What's next?




A history of trouble at NBC News


Here’s a metaphor for the disarray inside NBC News: Last weekend, workers at NBC’s Rockefeller Center headquarters briefly wiped away promotional photos of Brian Williams.


They removed the photos from a wall and painted over the words under them: “He’s been there, he’ll be there” — a tagline for a celebration of Williams’ 10th anniversary on the “NBC Nightly News.”


The next day the workers returned and put the pictures back up. But NBC employees were already buzzing with gossip.


The official word was that the temporary exhibit had been accidentally taken down two weeks early, and that’s why it was restored. The unofficial response was … more sarcastic.


No one knows what’s next for NBC News, and that’s why even the walls are being studied for clues.


Related: Brian Williams once eyed David Letterman’s job


Friday’s big shakeup — Andy Lack replacing Pat Fili-Krushel as the chairman of NBC News — is a clear sign of corporate dissatisfaction with the news division.


Lack’s challenges start at “Nightly News” but don’t end there. He has to restore confidence in the news division, improve morale among the rank-and-file, and regain ratings momentum at the network’s most important news asset, the “Today” show.


Lack, now 67, led the news division to greatness as its president in the 1990s. But the news industry has been flipped on its head since then, thanks to the Internet and smart phones.


After being introduced as the new chairman at an NBC staff meeting on Friday morning, he made a throwback joke: “How many hours is ‘Dateline’ on now?”


Expanding the newsmagazine franchise was a top achievement two decades ago, but it’s not the answer now.


On Sunday, New York magazine published a much-anticipated story about what it called “chaos” within the news division.


“The trouble didn’t start with Brian Williams,” the tagline to the story said.


“Over the past year,” reporter Gabriel Sherman wrote, “all of the NBC News marquee franchises — ‘Today,’ ‘Meet the Press,’ ‘Nightly News’ — have been badly damaged by bungled talent decisions and control-room shakeups. Taken together, the upheavals portray a news division that has allowed talent to take over.”


The magazine quoted a senior NBC executive as saying “there’s no adult supervision,” despite the fact that NBCUniversal CEO Steve Burke put Fili-Krushel in charge back in 2012 to be “adult supervision.”


Separately, a lengthy Business Insider story listed a number of insider complaints about Fili-Krushel earlier this week.


Fili-Krushel has not said anything publicly about Williams or herself. On Friday, Burke said Fili-Krushel “will move into a new role on my executive team” once Lack takes over in April.


NBC News president Deborah Turness remains in place, but her role will be “substantially diminished” with Lack in charge, Sherman wrote.


Related: 52% say Brian Williams should be allowed back on


In the coming months, Lack and Burke will have to make what will likely be their most high-profile decision: whether to let Williams return to “Nightly News.”


At the moment, Williams remains determined to mount a comeback. Sherman quotes a close friend as saying, “He can’t wait until he can speak. He’s just anxious to get back to work. And he can’t wait to respond.”


Lack and Williams have been friendly for decades, and Sherman reports that when NBC was deciding how to handle the controversy about Williams’ embellishments, “Lack called Burke and asked him to spare Williams with a short suspension.”


Some executives in the TV industry believe Lack will stand by Williams and seek to rehabilitate the anchor when the six-month suspension period is up in August. Others, however, are not so sure. They cite internal anger at Williams and the inherent risk in bringing him back.


And they speculate that Lack’s ability to talk frankly with Williams — friend-to-friend — could ease the transition from Williams to another anchor, like Lester Holt, who is currently filling in.


On CNN’s “Reliable Sources,” former CBS News president Andrew Heyward said much the same thing a senior NBC source said to me earlier on Sunday morning: that Williams’ fate is ultimately a business calculation, and ultimately up to Burke.


“It’s going to be a decision that has the interest of NBC News and, not to sound too corny, the American public at heart,” Heyward said. “It’s not going to be based on friendship or anything like that. It’s going to be a business-like decision based on whatever facts are on the ground at the time, including the review that NBC is still doing.”



Allison Williams on her dad:


CNNMoney (New York) March 8, 2015: 1:27 PM ET



Microsoft Store

Source link



Disarray at NBC News: What"s next?

Friday, March 6, 2015

Family drowns during tropical vacation



Four family members, including newlyweds, drowned while vacationing in the Dominican Republic with about a dozen family members. CNN affiliate KYW reports.





Microsoft Store

Source link



Family drowns during tropical vacation

Thursday, March 5, 2015

32 miners missing after blast







Story highlights


  • All bodies have been recovered from the mine, officials say

  • Methane is suspected in the blast at the Zasyadko mine in the Donetsk region

  • Ukrainian leaders accuse separatists of not giving access to Ukrainian rescue teams




Preliminary information indicates the explosion at Zasyadko mine was caused by methane gas, according to DAN, the official news agency for the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR).


“This did not happen because of shelling,” an emergency services official told the news agency.


The explosion occurred just before 6 a.m. local time, when 230 people were at the mine, the official website for separatist-controlled Donetsk city said.


Of those, 157 were evacuated in the initial hours after the blast, including 14 injured and one dead, according to the website. Fifteen rescue teams are working at the scene, it said.


Yatsenyuk: Separatists are not allowing rescue teams in


Zasyadko mine is one of the most dangerous in terms of methane in Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian news agency Ukrinform, which reported that 240 people had died at the mine since 1999 — 101 miners were killed in a single accident in 2007.


Ukrainian coal miners wait in a room before going underground to help search for the bodies.

Ukrainian coal miners wait in a room before going underground to help search for the bodies.



Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, speaking at a Cabinet meeting, accused the pro-Russian separatists who control the area of denying Ukrainian rescue teams access to the site, Ukrinform reported.


He urged Russia to tell the separatists to allow in the rescue workers.


“You took millions of Ukrainians in Donetsk and Luhansk hostage and are now brutalizing miners’ families by not letting in help,” Ukrinform quoted him as saying.


Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko also called for rescuers to be allowed in.


“I demand Ukrainian rescue workers and investigators to be granted access at the site of the tragedy,” he tweeted.


However, DPR representative Denis Pushilin said Ukraine had not offered help with the rescue, and the DPR will ask Russia or separatist authorities in Luhansk for help if needed, according to the separatists’ news agency.


Separatist leader Aleksandr Zakharchenko issued an order to close the mine a month ago, but managers ignored the order because the mine legally belongs to Ukraine, Ukrinform cited the separatist news agency as saying.


A shaky ceasefire is currently in place in Donetsk and the neighboring Luhansk region, the center of a months-long conflict between pro-Russian separatists and Ukrainian government forces.





Microsoft Store

Source link



32 miners missing after blast